Corps Planning Centers of Expertise (PCXs)
Civil Works Review Board
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Planning Guidance Notebook
WRDAs and and other Key Laws
Environmental Processes and Compliance
Feasibility Study Milestones
Feasibility Study Documentation
The Planning Team
The Vertical Team
Level of Detail
Submit a FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Feasibility Study Milestones
How many projects have completed the feasibility studies following the new process? If there aren't any yet, what is the farthest that some projects have progressed?
What are the SMART Planning principles?
What is SMART Planning?
What is the report synopsis?
Is there going to be an Agency Decision Milestone for every project under the new SMART milestone framework?
What exactly should be submitted with the draft report? Has Exhibit H-5 been superseded by Planning Bulletin 2013-03?
What if the tentatively selected plan is not endorsed at the Agency Decision Milestone meeting?
Does the Civil Works Review Board exist in the new milestone framework?
What does scalable mean?
Can you provide a crosswalk to compare legacy milestones and new process milestones; e.g., the Alternatives Milestone is between F2 and F3?
How do the new feasibility study milestones and process apply to ongoing (legacy) studies?
Is a charette a requirement for my study?
Does Agency Technical Review take place only on the draft report between the TSP milestone and the Agency decision milestone? Should ATR be conducted on the feasibility-level design of the Recommended Plan as well?
Agency Technical Review (ATR) is part of the concurrent review required once the draft report is released for public review at the TSP milestone. However, since the ATR lead is involved in the study from the start, they will advise the PDT when additional review is needed. This could be on modeling results prior to the TSP milestone or on cost estimates and design during the Feasibility Level Design phase. The ATR Lead will decide what aspects of the study, including the final design, need further review using risk informed decision making.
How do NEPA and other environmental compliance requirements fit into the new feasibility study process?
How will Districts confirm Federal Interest without a Reconnaissance Phase?
Do you have any guidance on when to start the clock and sign the FCSA for New Start feasibility studies?
Will non-Federal sponsors be able to contribute work-in-kind prior to having a signed Project Management Plan (PMP) in place?
Will a sponsor be required to have cash on hand when they sign the FCSA?
When are the Project Management Plan and Review Plan required to be completed?
What is optimization and when does optimization occur in the feasibility study process?
Can optimization begin before the Agency Decision Milestone?
When is optimization of a plan finished?
When is the Review Plan required to be completed, if funding isn't available until after the FCSA is signed?
Does the Directors Policy Memorandum replace or change SMART Planning milestones?
Does the delegation of decision-making at milestone meetings apply only to new studies?
The memorandum focuses on delegation of feasibility study milestone decision-making and review. Does this impact validation reports, post-authorization change reports for Section 902 cost increases, general re-evaluation reports, feasibility studies conducted under the Continuing Authorities Program (CAP) or Tribal Partnership Program, etc.?
Is the delegation of Watershed Study milestones changing based on this memorandum?
Privacy and Security Notice
Updated: February 2020