spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
Planning Community Toolbox
USACE Castle
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
Toolbox Home Link to Planner's Library Link to SMART Guide Link to Project Delivery Link to People Link to Tools Link to Processes Link to Training Link to Search Link to Contact Us spacer
spacer
spacer Description spacer spacer

Red divider graphic

Categories
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic
ball graphic

 
Red divider graphic

ball graphic

    The National Planning Centers of Expertise (PCXes) provide peer review, planning model certification, training, technical services, policy development support, and other services to the Planning community and the Corps. PCXes have been established for Coastal Storm Risk Management; Flood Risk Management; Inland Navigation; Deep Draft Navigation; Small Boat Harbors; Ecosystem Restoration; and Water Management and Reallocation.

    PCX Mission Statement
    The Planning Centers of Expertise enhance the Corps of Engineers' planning capability for inland navigation, deep draft navigation (including small boat harbors), ecosystem restoration, coastal and storm damage reduction, flood risk management, and water management and reallocation studies, through their focus on the technical evaluations and reviews associated with plan formulation during the preparation of decision documents. The Centers strengthen planner core competencies by assisting District Project Delivery Teams (PDTs) with technical expertise, peer reviews, model certifications, technology transfer, planner training, and providing lessons learned and best practices to the larger Planning Community of Practice.

    PCX Roles and Responsibilities
    1. Technical Services. Provide technical services to District PDTs from subject matter experts and/or at the direction of a Regional Management Board or the HQ Planning Advisory Board (PAB); accomplish costly, highly complex, and controversial studies or key analytical components of such studies for District PDTs, and multiregional or national efforts, on a reimbursable basis. Provide advice to HQUSACE, the laboratories, and other partners or stakeholders on significant regional or nationwide planning issues.

    2. Peer Review. Provide for and manage Agency Technical Review (ATR) and maintain rosters of regional technical specialists for conducting timely ATR. Function as the Review Management Organization for Independent External Peer Review (IEPR) to interface with the performing organization external to the Corps of Engineers conducting the IEPR and the District PDT.

    3. R&D. Assist in identifying Research and Development (R&D) priorities within the mission area to ensure field driven needs are identified and prioritized, and coordinate the recommendations with the PAB and the deputy, Planning Community of Practice.

    4. Training. Conduct training opportunities related to the assigned mission area to promote and maintain planning technical competency. Support the Planning Associates (PA) program through development and training of PAs along the CW business lines and specific PCX functions. Support national goals in enhancing professional and technical development, sharing knowledge, and promoting communication within the Community of Practice (CoP) and through coordination and integration of planning policies with the HQUSACE Planning CoP.

    5. Model Certification. Certify or approve for use the planning models identified in the Project Review Plans and add to the planners' tool box of certified models using the approved model certification protocol.

    6. Policy Development Support. Centers would supplement the HQUSACE staff in policy compliance review, if requested, on a reimbursable basis, on projects where the center has had no prior participation. Centers would also provide assistance with exporting policy training to the field or providing review of draft policy.

    7. Process Improvement. Develop standard processes and procedures related to their mission areas to support District execution. Support Corps-wide process improvement initiatives through their subject matter experts' participation on process improvement teams.

    8. Lessons Learned. Manage a program of sharing lessons learned through coordination with the MSC regional planning expertise centers, sponsoring workshops, technology transfer, or use of intranet resources such as SharePoint.

    More information about the PCXes:

     

    National Coastal and Storm Damage Risk Management Planning Center of Expertise
    In 2003, the National Coastal and Storm Damage Risk Management Planning Center of Expertise was established by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Director of Civil Works, at the North Atlantic Division. The center provides services including technical review, training, modeling and research and development support to the nation with analysis and plan formulation related to such conditions as future storm risk, sea level change, and shoreline changes.
    PCX Website

    Planning Center of Expertise Websites

  • Coastal Storm Risk Management
  • Deep Draft Navigation
  • Ecosystem Restoration
  • Flood Risk Management  Corps Castle
  • Inland Navigation
  • Small Boat Harbor
  • Water Management and Reallocation

    Links and Documents for More Information

  • Planning Models
    Connect to guidance, certified models, models in review, model documentation, and the Ecosystem Restoration Model Library.
  • Review
    Connect to guidance and helpful resources on Peer Review, District Quality Control (DQC), and Agency Technical Review (ATR).
  • USACE Planning Centers of Expertise SharePoint
  • USACE Technical Excellence Network (TEN) Engineering and Construction
  • ER 1110-1-8158 Corps-Wide Centers of Expertise Program (15 April 2011)
    This regulation defines the policy and process for establishing and maintaining expert designations under the Corps-wide Centers of Expertise (CX) Program.
  • Reorganization of the Small Boat Harbor Planning Sub-Center of Expertise (SBH-PSCX)
    The purpose of this memo is to notify the Deep Draft Navigation Planning Center of Expertise (DDNPCX) of Pacific Ocean Divisions (POD) intent to reorganize day-to-day operations of the Small Boat Harbor Planning Sub-Center of Expertise (SBH-PSCX).

    Webinars

      2020
    • Ecological Model Review and Certification Process (9 July)
      This webinar, presented by Nate Richards (ECO-PCX Model Review Manager), provided an overview of the model certification process for ecological models and presented advancements in the process. Model review and certification has a reputation of taking a long time and requiring significant funds. These misconceptions, among others, have decreased in recent years thanks to a greater understanding of the certification requirements, increased emphasis on model quality by planning teams, delegation of approval authority, and implementation of best practices. The webinar also provided useful information and tips for planners, decision-makers, researchers, and others that develop, implement, and review aspects of ecological planning models.
    • Small Boat Harbor Planning Sub-Center of Expertise Overview (25 June)
      This webinar provided an overview of the Small Boat Harbor Planning Sub-Center of Expertise (SBH- PSCX) and the nuances of SBH planning. This Sub-Center of Expertise functions collaboratively as a sub-unit of the Deep Draft Navigation Planning Center of Expertise, with a specific focus on harbors that serve vessels that are primarily 14-foot draft or less. Presenters including Cindy Upah (Planning Chief, Alaska District and Technical Deputy, SBH-PSCX) and Eric Johnson (Economist, Alaska District) discussed planning for these multi-use harbors, which entails special considerations for a mix of commercial, recreation, subsistence, government, and research vessels. The emphasis on small boat harbor planning recognizes the specialization of technical analyses that is generally not found in inland or deep draft navigation planning analyses. The presenters also detailed the range of services offered by the SBH-PSCX, from production to review management to consultation with PDTs.
    • Ecological Model Development within the Planning Phase (20 February)
      This webinar provided an overview of the advancements being made in ecological model development. The webinar was presented by Dr. Kyle McKay (ERDC-EL), Dr. Todd Swannack (ERDC-EL), and Nate Richards (ECO-PCX Model Review Manager), and focused on developed and implemented tools, guidelines, and methodologies that improve the way we develop ecological models and align development, certification, and project planning. Case studies presented demonstrated that model development and certification are not only possible within SMART Planning timelines, but also valuable to decision-making.
    • Deep Draft Navigation: A Comprehensive Overview (23 January)
      This webinar provided a comprehensive overview of deep draft navigation in USACE, intended for project delivery team members at every level and in every discipline who are looking to better understand this mission area. Presenters discussed broad influences in world trade routes, described USACE deep draft ports in the nation and port characteristics, and addressed planning, economics, engineering, and environmental considerations within a feasibility study in the spirit of SMART and risk-informed planning. Presenters from the Deep Draft Navigation Planning Center of Expertise (DDNPCX) included: Eric Bush (SAD Planning Chief and Director of the DDNPCX), Stacey Roth (Plan Formulation Lead, Jacksonville District), Todd Nettles (Technical Director, DDNPCX), Max Millstein (Senior Economist, SAD), Michael Wolz (Lead Civil Engineer, SAD), and Angela Dunn (Environmental Branch Chief, Jacksonville District).

      2018
    • Incorporating Risk-Informed Decision Making for Costal Storm Risk Management Studies (18 October)
      Mr. Steve Couch (New York District), Ms. Carrie McCabe (Fort Worth District Regional Planning and Environmental Center at Galveston District) and Mr. Jeff Gebert (Philadelphia District) provided an overview of the Coastal Storm Risk Management (CSRM) business line, and discussed business line specific policies and guidance relevant to these studies as well as common challenges and risks. The presentation was moderated by Larry Cocchieri, CSRM Planning Center of Expertise (North Atlantic Division). The presentation addressed conducting iterations of risk informed planning in a CSRM feasibility study with a focus on the various areas where CSRM studies differ from other types of business line studies.
    • Inland Flood Risk Management Studies: Risk-Informed Business Line Introduction (16 August)
      Mr. Nick Applegate, Economic and Risk Analysis Section Chief, Sacramento District; Mr. Peter Blodgett, PE, Senior Hydraulic Engineer, Sacramento District; Ms. Sara Schultz, Senior Water Resources Planner, Sacramento District; and Mr. Eric Thaut, Deputy Director, FRM-PCX provided an overview of the Flood Risk Management business line. The presenters discussed specific policies and guidance relevant to flood risk management studies, as well as common challenges and risks in flood risk management. The presentation addressed conducting iterations of risk informed planning in a flood risk management feasibility study, including practical examples. This webinar was the second in a series of seven business line webinars presented in the PCoP webinar series.
    • Water Management and Reallocation Studies: Risk-Informed Business Line Introduction (2 August)
      Ms. Cherilyn Plaxco, Technical Director, Water Management and Reallocation Studies Planning Center of Expertise, provided an overview of the Water Management and Reallocation business line, specifically discussing business line specific policies and guidance relevant to water reallocation studies as well as common challenges and risks in water reallocation. The presentation addressed conducting iterations of risk-informed planning in a water allocation feasibility study including analysis of a case study, and focused on the various areas where water allocation studies differ from other types of business line studies.

      2016
    • Plan Formulation Strategies for Ecosystem Restoration Projects (1 September)
      This webinar presented formulation strategies that have been successfully applied on ecosystem restoration studies. It was presented by Mr. Leigh Skaggs, HQ Office of Water Project Review.

      2013
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Summary Series Wrap-up (1 May)
      Bill Frechione
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Navigation Economic System Modeling (24 April)
      Buddy Langdon
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Great Lakes Vessel Operating Costs (17 April)
      This webinar, presented by Roger Haberly, Stephen Stalikas (both Regional Economists, Buffalo District), and Bill Frechione (Regional Economist, Pittsburgh District) discussed the Great Lakes fleet and vessel types and also provided an overview of inland navigation vessel operating costs.
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Elasticity of Demand - Shipper Responsiveness (10 April)
      Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D.
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Navigation Component Engineering Reliability (3 April)
      Gabriela M. Lyvers
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Engineering Reliability (27 March)
      Mark Lisney
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Transportation Rate Analysis and Externalities (20 March)
      Lin Prescott
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Waterway Traffic Projections (13 March)
      Wes Walker
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Navigation Data Resources Webinar (6 March)
      Dick Ash
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Great Lakes Navigation Economics 101 (27 February)
      This webinar, presented by Roger Haberly (Regional Economist, Buffalo District) discussed the Great Lakes fleet and vessel types and also provided an overview of inland navigation vessel operating costs.
    • Inland Navigation Economics Webinar Series: Inland Navigation Economics 101 (20 February)
      Mark Hammond

 Corps Castle Item is restricted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CAC required. Document will open in a new window.